<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS vs. Table Based Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.templatesfactory.net/articles/css-vs-table-based-design.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.templatesfactory.net/articles/css-vs-table-based-design.html</link>
	<description>TemplatesFactory.Net Articles!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pieter</title>
		<link>http://www.templatesfactory.net/articles/css-vs-table-based-design.html#comment-6948</link>
		<dc:creator>pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.53.81.218/articles/css-vs-table-based-design.html#comment-6948</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. Just want to add another argument.
Nowadays people go to the computer shop and acquire a wide screen of 1200 pixels wide up to 1900 pixels wide. Coming home they see their favorite css build sites looking like small postal stamps (hopefully centered) in a screen filled with the background color because they are all hard coded in css for lets say 800*600 so the designer can place his/her image at hard coded location x,y,z. Give me a scaling table designed site that does [width ="95%"]. Then you get on your screen what you've paid for! If it's tooooo wide one can even _choose_ to reduce the active window size to your liking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. Just want to add another argument.<br />
Nowadays people go to the computer shop and acquire a wide screen of 1200 pixels wide up to 1900 pixels wide. Coming home they see their favorite css build sites looking like small postal stamps (hopefully centered) in a screen filled with the background color because they are all hard coded in css for lets say 800*600 so the designer can place his/her image at hard coded location x,y,z. Give me a scaling table designed site that does [width ="95%"]. Then you get on your screen what you&#8217;ve paid for! If it&#8217;s tooooo wide one can even _choose_ to reduce the active window size to your liking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil McBride</title>
		<link>http://www.templatesfactory.net/articles/css-vs-table-based-design.html#comment-6939</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.53.81.218/articles/css-vs-table-based-design.html#comment-6939</guid>
		<description>Very useful article in plain English. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful article in plain English. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
